Climate Ark News Archive

Non-profit climate news links and archive of materials no longer on web provided on these terms to help find solutions and for posterity

Disclaimer & Conditions for Use | Share on Facebook |

Should we label genetically modified food?

To ensure food security, we will need biotechnology. But will the spread of GM benefit hungry consumers, or global agribusiness?

Source:  Copyright 2012, Guardian
Date:  November 22, 2012
Byline:  Bhaskar Vira and David Nally
Original URL: Status ONLINE

On the sidelines of the US presidential election, battle lines were drawn on a Californian ballot that has potential implications for broader debates about the challenges of global food security. Proposition 37, which was narrowly defeated (52.8% of voters opposed the measure), would have required mandatory labelling for all genetically engineered food sold to consumers in California.

Supporters argued that people had the right to know exactly what they were buying, and the requirement for foods to be appropriately labelled was simply a way of allowing them to make a more informed choice. Opponents claimed the measure would ultimately increase household grocery costs by generating additional bureaucracy and potentially tying up farmers and agricultural businesses in expensive litigation.

Behind the scenes were fierce arguments about the use of genetic technology in the food industry, concerns about biosafety, and a demonstration of the filibustering power ...

Continue to Read Full Article at Source

Climate Ark users agree to the site disclaimer as a condition for use.